Everything that decides viability, in a single engine.
Three geospatial questions decide a project: where to build, whether it can connect and whether the parcel is viable. CapiGIS answers them with status flags traceable to the source.
From coordinates to decision, in four steps.
Coordinates / KMZ / region
A parcel, a search area or an A→B route. No software to install.
250+ official layers
Environmental, grid, cadastre, topography, social and physical risk. The country’s data, curated locally.
800+ criteria · cited vetoes
A reproducible 0–100 score and every deal-killer with its regulation. Where data is missing, grey.
Delivery · <24 h
Ready for the investment committee and for your own systems. And with Vigía, the verdict stays monitored.
Six blocks, worked in parallel from day one.
Environmental & permitting
Protected areas by legal category, wetlands and archaeology. Deal-killers in red, with the rule cited.
Grid connection · the difference
Not just distance. Capacity, queue and saturation, plus which reinforcement frees headroom and when.
Topography & usable area
Satellite slope and truly installable hectares. MWp and CAPEX adjust on their own.
Cadastre
Real parcel, ownership where the registry publishes it, ejidos and prior consultation.
Social & territory
Settlements, communities and heritage. Opposition risk is assessed at the start.
Preliminary economics
CAPEX, LCOE and NPV/IRR bands with cited benchmarks, ready for committee.
Not every buyer values a project the same way. Neither should the scoring.
Your criteria are captured as a scoring profile and applied identically to every site. The same land can be a GO for one buyer and a REVIEW for another, and both are right.
Greenfield developer
Aggressive pipeline: speed, queue and land cost. The Top-N opens the funnel.
EPC / builder-operator
Constructability, access and real slope. No surprises on site.
Utility / IPP
A 30-year asset: firm grid, clean permitting, low social risk.
Fund / institutional
The economics band rules, and the early NO-GO is the committee’s best friend.
The profile is documented in the report: which weights and thresholds were applied and why. Criteria tuned to the client, never a black box. Switching profiles is a cheap re-run over the same sites, so a “developer view” versus “fund view” comparison can be commissioned too.
See it working on your case.
Tell us the site or area and what you need decided. You get a closed proposal before any work starts.
Analyze your project